Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree OCR: the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. $1951." Y5(a), (p), J.A. 91 95-97}4 Neither the Complaint nor the RICO Case State- ment alleges facts indicate "in detail and with speci- ficity" what the plaintiffs "reli[ed] upon T initiate" their "RICO claim alleges ind ividual conduct an Respondent involving acts of bombing "arson their agreenent such acts as part of conspiracy required by the Order of February 1991 Two months later, un May 78 1991. the District Court, expressly relying on the allegations set out in the RICO Case Statement, granted Respondents Motion Dismiss, holding that Petitioners failed claim under either the antitrust laws or RICO The Court then While dismissed Petitioners the case described entirety their 765 investigation Supp 937 941 ron- tinu[ing]" pue 92 I.A 88} ir the RICO Case State ...
(.png)
